Comparable sites
2 / 2
Aligned, quality-eligible snapshots
Demo Portfolio · Synthetic Sample Data
Explore the full demo workspace
Browse existing fleet tools without signing in. This read-only workspace uses bundled fictional examples, never customer records. It does not connect providers, send notifications, run models, upload data, or create work orders.
The 2-site overview, incidents, and report use July 22–August 20, 2026 reference totals. Advanced feature panels are separate illustrative scenarios with their own periods and assumptions—not recalculations of that portfolio, validated accuracy, or promised savings.
Independent two-record benchmark example
These two synthetic comparison records demonstrate the benchmark workflow. The seven-peer distribution is a separate illustrative method example, not observed peers for this two-site demo. Fictional site names provide navigation context only; the scenario is not calculated from their overview totals. No customer peers, benchmark PDF, or verified savings are represented.
Comparative opportunity
14 MWh
Against each site’s selected peer reference
Illustrative value
$1,120
Not guaranteed savings
Frozen revision
R2
2026-07-31 – 2026-08-29
Percentile/opportunity scatter
Left means weaker peer-relative performance; higher means more comparative energy opportunity.
CEPIP0P100
Portfolio percentile heatmap
Text and color identify weak, middle, strong, or unavailable results.
SitePerformanceAvailabilityCedar Ridge Community Solar · benchmark scenarioP14P19Pine Valley School District · benchmark scenarioP48P53
Metric distribution
PR_AC_OPERATIONAL · 7 compatible peers · moderate support
0.8P10
0.8P25
0.9Median
0.9P75
0.9P90
Action map
Performance percentile × comparative opportunity
Lower percentile and larger bar deserve review first.
Comparable-site ranking
Rankings use favorable-direction, tie-aware percentiles. Sites with incompatible definitions never share a distribution.
| Site | Performance | Availability | Cohort quality | Opportunity | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cedar Ridge Community Solar · benchmark scenario 7 eligible peers | P14 | P19 | MODERATE | 8,900 kWh $712 | Inspect context |
Pine Valley School District · benchmark scenario 7 eligible peers | P48 | P53 | MODERATE | 5,100 kWh $408 | Inspect context |
How ArraySignal keeps comparisons fair
Calculation boundary, capacity reference, irradiance source, KPI policy, timezone treatment, unit, and period must match before metadata-based cohort selection begins. Small cohorts suppress percentiles; relaxed dimensions and uncertainty remain visible.
- • Demo values are fictional and illustrate the benchmark workflow.
- • Comparative opportunity is not guaranteed recoverable energy or savings.
- • 2-record independent benchmark illustration; these values are not calculated from the demo overview and are not verified customer outcomes.
- • The seven-peer distribution is a hypothetical methodology example, not additional sites in the demo catalog or evidence that this two-site portfolio forms a valid cohort.
Ready to use your own data? Your customer workspace preserves your existing session and applies your organization role and plan. Uploads, saved changes, verified routes, schedules, and connections require an authorized account.
Open your customer workspace