Site performance
98.1%
Selected sample period
Solar intelligence for EPCs
ArraySignal helps EPCs and installers maintain visibility into expected-versus-actual production and emerging issues after handover, with customer reporting positioned honestly as product direction.
ArraySignal reference experience
A sample site view connecting current performance, availability, and open observations after handover.
Site performance
98.1%
Selected sample period
Availability
99.2%
Valid production windows
Open observations
2
Pending review
Expected vs actual tracking
Commissioned baseline
String variance observation
Supporting evidence available
Customer report package
Planned workflow
Fictional site names and illustrative values—not customer telemetry. These values do not represent guaranteed savings or unreleased functionality.
The operational problem
Once commissioning is complete, EPC teams may depend on fragmented monitoring views and ad hoc customer questions to understand whether a system continues to behave as expected.
Commissioning expectations may not remain connected to ongoing actual production and weather conditions.
Performance concerns can arrive without a shared evidence trail or consistent period comparison.
Customer-ready context often requires combining charts, observations, and caveats from several sources.
Workflow
A persistent analysis record can help connect modeled expectations, observed behavior, and investigation context through the post-handover period.
Preserve system capacity, location, timezone, and expected-production assumptions.
Compare ongoing actual behavior with weather-adjusted expectations.
Review persistent variance and data-quality evidence before drawing conclusions.
Use clearly qualified findings to support customer conversations.
Relevant capabilities
Monitor expected and actual performance across selected periods after system handover.
Surface probable performance and communications issues with supporting data-quality context.
A structured commissioning-to-operations record is a planned extension of the current site analysis foundation.
Customer-ready packaged and scheduled reports are planned, not represented as a currently delivered workflow.
Potential outcome
Ongoing visibility could help EPC teams respond to performance questions with a defined period, modeled expectation, and data-quality context instead of reconstructing the story from scratch.
ArraySignal analysis does not replace contractual testing, commissioning acceptance, warranty terms, or field confirmation. Customer reporting automation remains product direction.
Frequently asked questions
No. It provides ongoing analytical context and does not replace contractual acceptance testing, commissioning procedures, or engineering certification.
Yes. ArraySignal is designed as a vendor-neutral analysis layer. The MVP begins with CSV telemetry rather than requiring replacement of the existing monitoring platform.
Not as a complete packaged workflow. Performance tracking and issue visibility are demonstrated, while customer-ready report generation and distribution remain product direction.
The system uses probable classifications and explicit evidence. It does not describe a suspected issue as a confirmed equipment fault without confirmation data.
Request demo
Request an early-access demo focused on post-commissioning tracking, issue visibility, and the planned direction for customer reporting.
ArraySignal is in early access. The walkthrough uses fictional reference sites and demonstration analytics—not customer data.
A focused walkthrough
Tell us about your role, portfolio scale, monitoring platform, and primary challenge. After your request is saved, the next step will present scheduling when a provider is available.